Really? I would like to know. I saw this sign and thought, is it possible that these designers/advertisers know that they are producing bad ads and therefore spend more media dollars plastering their ads everywhere? It doesn’t seem like that would be a good solution. Wouldn’t we just get more irritated by seeing these bad ads more often and therefore want to buy the product less? Maybe people really don’t understand and think their ads are good. Or maybe they know their ads are bad, but it’s faster to produce bad ads and therefore they can produce more of them? I’d like to hear what other people think…why is there so much more bad advertising than good?

I’ve also added some ads that I thought were successful. They are to the point, simple, funny and kept me interested in seeing what the next scenario would be.






  1. Fil

    The first commenter makes a really good point with the South Korean analogy. The same applies in Japan, a VERY media centric country where ads—both good and bad—are plastered EVERYWHERE just to get the “word” out and possibly influence any takers.

  2. Mary

    Very good points. But I also agree it is totally annoying to see bad ads.

  3. Fil

    Yes, its annoying to see bad advertising. But Additives does have a point that regardless if they are bad, annoying, etc, the companies producing them are rather effective that eliciting the desired response, which is your average person buying or making use of XYZ product/service. Likewise good advertising can be used in the very same way.

    On another note, here’s some cool advertising by a clothing company in Japan called Uniqlo http://www.uniqlo.jp/uniqlock/
    They change it every once in awhile too.

  4. Ashlee

    Huge corporations taking risks and making money is not bad advertising though. I agree that Geico ad is simple, tricky, and intelligent. We should take risks in advertising, I think that helps make better advertising. Bad advertising usually is not creative and new. I don’t think you guys have hit on a good “bad advertising” example yet.
    So I guess you guys are agreeing with the sign. Since the ads are bad, they need to be repeated often to stick in peoples’ minds. I don’t believe good advertising needs that repetitiveness though, even though it happens. However, and this may just be the designer in me, when I see bad advertising it irritates me and I will sometimes hold a grudge. Or if an ad isn’t even designed well I will not give it enough attention to even find out what the product or service is.

  5. Amigo

    Research show that 80% of all advertising is ignored. We simply can’t process all the messages put in front of us every day. It’s impossible. So the point is that as a company do you want to spend a dumb dollar or a smart dime? Dumb dollar: produce wallpaper ads that are mostly ignored but through spending significantly more on media placement you do get a % of the 20% every once in a while. Smart dime: Create ads that engage and get remembered; get passed along to millions of eyes through the channels of social media, talked about at the coffee shop or break room or carpool all with less media exposure required. All because you took the time to respect the consumer’s time by delivering the value of entertainment!! El gato es gordo, aribaaa!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *